Health Care Reform’s Top Priority Should Be: REDUCE COSTS

President Obama stated in a recent speech to Congress that his health care plan has three objectives.  He said, “It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance. It will provide insurance to those who don’t. And it will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government.”

While in general I can agree with these objectives, I think the current health care proposals from the President and Congress place an emphasis on the first two objectives – to provide security and insurance for all – and place the third objective as an afterthought – that of reducing costs.  In fact, I believe the current proposals all will increase costs, especially in the long run.

The emphasis should be to reduce health care costs first.  Doing so will help to provide stability for those who currently have health insurance as well as make it easier to insure the uninsured because of the lowered cost.  There is plenty of room for reducing costs with many areas that should be addressed.  Let’s not pass legislation that does everything it can to provide insurance for all without addressing the biggest concern – dramatic increases in health care expenses.  Doing so will run us bankrupt because sooner or later someone will have to pay for the ever increasing costs.  Remember that whether it is the government, businesses, insurance companies, health care providers, or consumers who pay for the costs up front, the cost will eventually come back to the consumer via higher taxes, higher fees, or lower wages.

There are many areas of discussion regarding health care cost reduction which will be covered in future posts. 



One Response

  1. Well said. It is ridiculous that cost-reduction isn’t first and top priority. $1 of our hard-earned money does not equal $1 in the current health care system so to give our tax money to such a cause is a waste.

    Where to start? How about making it harder to sue doctors for frivolous reasons at ridiculous sums. Then prices wouldn’t be so inflated to cover their insurance premiums.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: